Phinney Estate Law
Follow Us or Like Us
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Profile of Jamie Clausen
    • Profile of Michael Ballnik
    • Holistic Approach
  • Practice Areas
    • Estate Planning & Disability Planning
    • Probate & Trust Administration
    • Guardianship & Elder Law
    • Mediation & Conflict Coaching
  • Blog
  • Fee Schedule
  • Free Classes
  • Client Reviews
  • Contact Us

Time to Visit Your Estate Plan? Forbes thinks so....

3/30/2012

7 Comments

 
Picture
Forbes Magazine has an interesting article this week on reasons why Boomers should revisit their estate plan.  Inspired?  Contact us to set up a free 1/2 hour consultation to review your estate plan and see if it is time to make some changes to better match who you and your family are now. Email us at  info@phinneyestatelaw.com or call us at 206-459-1908.

7 Comments

Join Us at WSBA ADR Section Event Tomorrow Evening

3/28/2012

7 Comments

 
Please join the WSBA ADR Section’s Membership Committee for our third Panel Discussion and Networking Event, Thursday, March 29, 5:30pm at the Red Lion Hotel in Downtown Seattle. We’ll be featuring a panel of experts on the topic of Collaborative Probate. Our panelists are:
  • Jamie Clausen, Attorney at Phinney Estate Law;
  • David Strickland, Attorney at Strickland Law;
  • Kathleen Wareham, WAMS Mediation & Arbitration Panel Member.
Cost: FREE to ADR Section members, ADR section subscribers and invited guests. We’ll follow the panel presentation with hors d'oeuvres and refreshments. Come have a drink on us, hear from the experts, and then discuss it all and network with your colleagues. For details and to RSVP click here to go to the event page. (Please be aware that this event is for the enrichment of attendees. The views expressed by the panelists are their own and not an official statement of position by the WSBA or the ADR Section.)
7 Comments

Selecting a Health Care Agent

3/22/2012

6 Comments

 
Picture
The first step in any good Health Care Disability Plan, and probably the most important, is to choose your Health Care Agent.

A Health Care Agent, also sometimes called a Health Care Proxy, is the person you select  to speak for you in a medical crisis, in case you are not able to speak for yourself. 

 Under Washington State’s default statute for those who do not makes their own plan, spouses or registered domestic partners are given priority in decision making, followed by adult children.  However, the ultimate decision maker is the patient’s guardian, if one exists, and family disputes can erupt and health care decisions be delayed if family members or friends attempt to be named guardian when there is a lack of consensus about care.

For those who are single and have either multiple children or no children the need to make it clear who has decision making authority is even more important.  In any case, medical crisis decision making usually goes best when the hospital is clear about who the decision maker is and are confident that disputes about who is in charge are not part of the equation.

In naming a health care agent, it is usually easiest to name one person or agent to serve at a time, with at least one successor, or back-up person, in case the first person is not available when needed.  However there may be good reasons for selecting more than one person to serve at a time as well, such as a desire to include all of your children.

If you do chose more than one person you will need to include how you want decisions to be made (i.e.. all must agree v. majority rule.)  It is also possible to include a request that your primary agent consults with others, be it family members or a close friend with greater medical knowledge, while still leaving only one final decision maker.  It may also be possible to name someone you trust who lives near you to serve as a temporary agent until your first choice agent is able to come to the treatment facility if the person you must trust to make ultimate decisions lives far away.  An Attorney familiar with disability planning can help you to think through the pros and cons various arrangements and think creatively about solutions to potential problems that might arise.

The following are come important questions to ask when weighting possible agents.  Keep in mind that the importance of some of these factors may depend on whether your top priority is having your wishes honored or having your family feel best about the process.

1. Does your agent meet the legal criteria for acting as agent or proxy or representative?  (In Washington State, that includes a requirement that the person be at least 18 and not be your doctor or otherwise employed by your health care provider unless they are an immediate family member.)

2. Would your agent be willing to speak on your behalf?

3. Would your agent be able to act on your wishes and separate his/her own feelings from yours?

4. Does your agent lives close by or could they travel to be at your side if needed?

5. Does your agent  know you well and understands what’s important to you?

6. Could your agent handle the responsibility?

7. Will your agent talk with you now about sensitive issues and will listen to your wishes?

8. Will your agent likely be available long into the future?

9. Would your agent be able to sensitively handle conflicting opinions between family members and friends?

10. Can your agent be a strong advocate in the face of an unresponsive doctor or institution?

The decision of who you select as your Health Care Agent should be document in a valid Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care which will be discussed in later posts. 

If you would like help selecting your Health Care Agent or crafting a Durable Power of Attorney, please call or email now for a free half hour consultation to see if our services are right for you.  Tel. 206.459.1908 or info@phinneyestatelaw.com or attend one of our free classes.

6 Comments

Jamie Clausen Chairing 3/21 CLE on Collaborative Probate & Elder Law

3/20/2012

9 Comments

 
On March 21, 2012, Jamie Clausen will be a half day CLE on Collaborative Probate and Elder Law for the King County Bar Association.  If you haven't registered yet, it isn't too late.  Other presenters include Jeff Bean, David Strickland, Former Commissioner Eric Watness, Kathleen Wareham, Joanna Roth, and Alexandra Moore-Wulsin.

When:March 21, 2012  12:00 to 4:30
Where: Rainier Square Conference Center, 1301 Fifth Avenue, 3rd Floor Atrium, Seattle
Credits: 3.50 General and .50 Ethics CLE Credits

AGENDA:

11:30-12:00 Registration and Coffee Service
        Attendees are welcome to bring a brown-bag lunch

12:00-12:15pm Welcome and Overview
       Jamie Clausen, Phinney Estate Law, Chair

12:15-12:45pm Making the Collaborative Law Choice
       Jeffrey P. Bean, Beyond the Courthouse Mediation
  • What is Collaborative Law?
  • Collaborative Lawyers' Roles: From Advocating Positions to Representing Interests
  • Making the Process Choice: How to Choose Your Path to Resolution
12:45-1:30pm Participation Agreements for Probate and Elder Law
        David A. Strickland, Attorney at Law
        Alexandra Moore-Wulsin, Strata Law Group
  • What is a Participation Agreement?
  • Review of Model Participation Agreements
  • Considerations in Presenting Participation Agreements to Clients and Opposing Parties
1:30-1:45pm Break

1:45-2:30pm Collaborative Approaches to Classic Probate Conflicts
     The Honorable Eric Watness, Jams, King County Superior Court Commissioner (Ret.)
     Jamie Clausen, Phinney Estate Law
  • Will Contests
  • Inventory Disputes
  • PR Creditor Claims
  • Distribution Disputes
  • Real Estate Distributions
2:30-3:00pm Demonstration of Facilitation/Mediation in an Elder Law and Probate Case
    Kathleen Wareham, WAMS Mediation & Arbitration Panel Member
    Alexandra Moore-Wulsin, Strata Law Group
  • Using the Collaborative Model and Working with the Mediator/Facilitator
  • Discussing the Process and Identifying Participants
  • Developing the Agenda and Identifying Legal and Underlying, Broader Issues
3:00-3:15pm Break

3:15-3:45pm Ethics in Collaborative Probate and Elder Law
    Joanna Roth, Attorney at Law
  •  Zealous Advocacy Issues RPC 1.1
  •  Minors and Disabled Beneficiaries RPC 1.14 and RPC 3.4
  •  Privilege and Fiduciary Obligations RPC 1.6
  •  Safety for Vulnerable Participants RPC 3.3
3:45-4:30pm Question & Answer Panel
      All Speakers

4:30pm Evaluations and Adjournment
9 Comments

The Consent Statute: Your Default Disability Plan

3/16/2012

5 Comments

 
Picture
In past posts we have talked about the situations that might arise that would require someone else to make health care choices for you if you couldn't give informed consent and the kind of choices that they might have to make.  In upcoming posts we will discuss how to plan to have the right person make these choices and how to make sure they get enough instruction to do the job well.  But before we get to that, we thought it would be helpful to explain what happens if you don't make a plan.  In Washington those choices are governed by Statute, specifically RCW 7.70 which is commonly known as the "consent statute." 

 
Under Washington law, if the patient is incapacitated and cannot understand and/or communicate to give informed consent to give or decline a medical treatment, your medical provider must turn to someone else to make that decision.  Washington has a statute that gives a list of people who can provide that consent.  RCW 7.70.065

That statute states that members of the classes of people can provide such consent in the following order of priority:
     (i) The appointed guardian of the patient, if any;
     (ii) The individual, if any, to whom the patient has given a durable power of attorney that encompasses the authority to make health care decisions;
     (iii) The patient's spouse or state registered domestic partner;
     (iv) Children of the patient who are at least eighteen years of age;
     (v) Parents of the patient; and
     (vi) Adult brothers and sisters of the patient.

If the health care provider makes reasonable efforts to locate and secure authorization from a competent person in the first or succeeding class and cannot find that person, authorization may be given by any person in the next class in the order of descending priority. However, no person under may provide informed consent to health care:
     (i) If a person of higher priority under this section has refused to give such authorization; or
     (ii) If there are two or more individuals in the same class and the decision is not unanimous among all available members of that class.

The people named in the statute are suppose to do what they believe the patient would have wanted if that can be determined. If they cannot determine that, then to do what they believe to be in the patient's best interests.

For people who do not engage in advance planning this statute creates a number of pitfalls.   

Without a health care agent named in a proper durable power of attorney, many clients will not have surviving family in any of these categories so that their medical choices can only be made with the appointment of a legal guardian.

The people listed in the statute may not be the right people to make choices for them, especially if they are not close to members of their family of origin or if they have very different opinions from them on issues surrounding health care.

There may be more than one person in the relevant category who do not agree, that is common when parents, adult children, and siblings must make unanimous decisions.

Even if every person in the highest category agrees, family members, friends, or other interested parties can always try to override that decision my seeking to be appointed as the person's guardian, which is what has happened in many of the highly publicized family fights over end of life issues in recent years.   Because hospitals know that this can happen, some will want to wait to make decisions in cases without advanced planning until everyone with a possible interest agrees, this can lead to delays in providing or withdrawing care even in cases where no guardianship petition is ever filed.

The decision maker(s) also may have no idea what the client would want them to decide.  That can lead to them making the wrong choice or, even if they are making the right choice, experiencing real agony about not knowing that they are.

These problems can best addressed by selecting a health care agent and appointing them in a Durable Power of Attorney for Heath Care and preparing an Advanced Health Care Directive, Advanced Mental Health Care Directive, or POLST as needed.

If you would like more information on how the consent statute might work in your particular case, are having trouble getting a health care provider to honor your role in the statute, wish to file a guardianship because the statute is resulting in the wrong decisions being made, or you want to create a plan to avoid the problems described above, contact us for a free 1/2 hour consultation at info@phinneyestatelaw.com.


5 Comments

Disabilty Choices: Artifical Hydration and Nutrition

3/8/2012

13 Comments

 
Picture
One of the most talked about choices a health care agent may have to make for someone unable to make their own medical choices is whether to keep a patient alive through artificial hydration and/or nutrition. 

If a person is unable to consume or keep down food and fluids they must be given liquids directly into their bloodstream and liquid nutrition needs to be put directly into their stomach through a feeding tube to keep them alive.  This isn’t food and drink in the way that we normally experience it.  

Hospice workers report that when a person is dying, their organs shut down, and they stop feeling hungry or thirsty.  Until that time, what makes a person feel thirsty is having a dry mouth, which is remedied by ice chips or other water in the mouth.  IV liquid won’t prevent thirst and people on feed tubes rarely would feel hungry without.  But these tools are necessary to keep them alive.

While people often take a black and white approach to these tools, the reality is that people often make different choices about them depending on the circumstances.  Most people, if otherwise healthy, would want IV fluid if they became dehydrated due to flu or other illness.  Many would want both fluids and nutrition if they were in a coma that was potentially reversible at least for a few weeks to see if they would regain consciousness.  Most of my clients indicate that they wouldn't want to be kept alive for years through these tools if they were in a permanent conscious condition.  But even if the choice changes from condition to condition, I think it is helpful if the agent understand the choice is to prolong life or not prolong life and not a choice of leaving a patient thirsty or starving as they die.


13 Comments

2012's New Charities for Discount Charity Program Announced

3/6/2012

5 Comments

 
Picture
We are pleased to announce the three new charities being added to our Charity Discount Program in 2012.   The groups nominated and receiving the most votes by our facebook fans are:
  • Program for Early Parent Support (PEPS)
  • New Beginnings
  • Seattle Works
These groups join the list of charities that are already included in our program:
  • Seattle Milk Fund
  • Within Reach
  • PAWS
  • Food Lifeline
Clients making donations of $500 or more to one of these groups in their will or trust receive 10% off their estate planning fees.  Selected charities also receive in-kind donations to use in fundraising and free classes for members or volunteers.  Want to see your favorite charity added to the list?  Become a fan of Phinney Estate Law on Facebook and let us know.  Want to take advantage of the discount? Contact us at 206.459.1908 or info@phinneyestatelaw.com to set up a free 1/2 hour consultation.

5 Comments

    PEL Blog

    This Blog is written by Seattle Attorneys Jamie Clausen & Michael Ballnik.
    It is made available for educational purposes only. Its purpose is to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. Reading this blog does not create an attorney client relationship between you and Phinney Estate Law. Because each individual and family is unique, the Blog should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

    Archives

    April 2020
    January 2020
    April 2018
    December 2017
    October 2017
    March 2016
    November 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    December 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    March 2014
    January 2014
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    January 2012
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011

    Categories

    All
    Abatement
    Admemption
    Administrator
    Advance Health Care Directive
    Collaborative Law
    Community
    Community Classes
    Debt
    Disability Planning
    Discounts
    Downsizing
    End Of Life Planning
    Estate Planning
    Events
    Guardianship
    Health Care Agent
    Health Care Planning
    Holistic Law
    Immigration
    Informed Consent
    Intestate Administration
    Last Will And Testament
    Legacy
    Legacy Planning
    Legacy Statement
    Lgbt
    Living Will
    Mediation
    Organ Donation
    PEPS
    Posthumous Heirs
    Power Of Attorney
    Probate
    Probate Litigation
    Quasi-community Property
    Science Alerts
    Slayer Rule
    Social Security
    Tax
    Trust Administration
    Undue Influence
    Unmarried Partners
    Will Contest
    Word Of The Week

    RSS Feed